• Ориенталистика
• 2023 год
• Vol 6, № 3-4

In the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries pre-modern Islamic past and imperial present of the Turkic Muslim peoples in the Ural-Volga region became the object of meticulous study for Muslim historians-reformers, who belonged themselves to these peoples, like Shihab al-Din Marjani, Rida’ al-Din Fakhreddinov, Murad Ramzi, Munir Hadi, Hasan-Ata Gabashi, Hadi Atlasi. This article presents to readers the first results of a comparative investigation of their historical works with the focus made on the works by Murad Ramzi. The author argues that the historical works under study, though they were composed in the traditional ta’rikh (in Pl. tawarikh) genre typical for the Islamic bookish tradition, form a transitional type from the Muslim chronicle to the national positivist historiography based on the scientific method of historical sources criticism. They share typical settings of traditional Muslim historiography, yet experience a strong influence of the positivist scholarship in Western Europe and Russia dating the second half of the 19th century. These works are brought together by a sharp criticism of the content of Muslim chronicles, which were still popular among the reading Muslim public at the turn of the 20th century. Their authors attempted to rewrite critically the history of their own peoples, without departing from Islamic foundations, but taking into account benefits of modern positivist scholarship. They all including Ramzi aimed at seeking for objective truth, freed from errors and superstitions of folk legends.

• Murad Ramzi
• Shihab al-Din Marjani
• jadid Muslim reformers
• Russia’s Turkic Muslim peoples
• ta’rikh chronicles
• national historiography
• positivist criticism of sources and historiography

1. Alexeev I. L. History as an Islamic Science: Marjani and Ibn Khaldun. Islamology. 2019. Vol. 9, pp. 25–32 (in Russian).
2. Akhmadullin S.Z. Presenting History of the Bashkirs in Mustafad al-Akhbar by Shihab al-Din Marjani and Talfiq al-akhbar by Murad Ramzi: Its Source Database and Methodological Approaches. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiia i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Scholarship, Cultural Studies and Art Criticism. Questions of Theory and Practice]. 2017. No. 6-1(80), pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
3. Akhmadullin S. Z. Talfiq al-akhbar by Murad Ramzi as a Source for History of the Bashkirs. PhD Dissertation… in History. Moscow: Institute of Russian History, 2019 (in Russian).
4. Bartol’d V. V. Musul’manskii mir [The Muslim World]. In: Bartol’d V. V. Sochineniia [Collected Works]. Vol. 6. Moscow: Nauka, 1966, pp. 207–297 (in Russian).
5. Gainutdinov D. M. Controversies among the Tatars about Their Ethnogenesis in the 18th–19th Centuries: “Muslim”, “Bulgar” and Tatar Identification. Vestnik KazGUKI [Newsletter of the Kazan State University of Culture and Arts]. 2015. No. 4–1, pp. 20–24 (in Russian).
6. Gallyamov D. F. Historical Discourses in the TurkicMuslim Ideology of the Second Half of the 19th — the beginning of the 20th Century. Problemy vostokovedeniya [Problems of Oriental Studies]. 2011. No. 2(52), pp. 90–96 (in Russian).
7. Iggers G. G., Wang Q. E. A Global History of Modern Historiography. Transl. from English by O. Vorob’eva. Moscow: Kanon+, 2012 (in Russian).
8. Katanov N. F. A Brief Overview of the Tatar Historical Books. Kazan: TypoLitigraphy of the Kazan Imperial University, 1912 (in Russian).
9. Nasyrov I. R. “Ibn-Khaldunism” in the Ottoman Intellectual Tradition in the 16th–20th Centuries. Filosofskii zhurnal [Philosophical Journal]. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 3, pp. 106–120 (in Russian).
10. Nasyrov I. R. The Place and Role of Tradition in Renewal. Islam v sovremennom mire [Islam in the Modern World]. 2022. No. 2, pp. 75–102 (in Russian).
11. Stepanyants M. T. Philosophical Aspects of Sufism. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL, 1987 (in Russian).
12. Frank A. Islamic Historiography and the Bulgarian Identity of the Tatars and the Bashkirs in Russia. Transl. from English. Kazan: Rossian Islamic University, 2008 (in Russian).
13. Khamidullin B. L. History of the Kazan Khanate in the Works of Tatar Historians of the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries [Electronic resource]. Tiurko-Tatarskii mir [Turkic Tatar World]: Available from: URL: http://www.tataroved.ru/publication/tthan/9 (accessed: 04.08.2017) (in Russian).
14. Iuzmukhametov R. T. Text Structure and Language Particularities of Kitabe mustafad al-akhbar fi akhwal Qazan wa Bulgar (Book of Useful Information on the History of Kazan and Bulgar) by Shigabutdin Marjani. Abstract of the PhD Dissertation on Philology, 10.02.02. Kazan: Kazan State University, 2002 (in Russian).
15. Aykut Abdulsait. The Intellectual Struggle of Murad Ramzi (1855–1935): An Early 20th — Century Eurasian Muslim Author: PhD Disssertation. Madison: Thw University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2015.
16. Fahreddinov R. Talfik al-ahbar wa talkih al-asar fi waqa’i‘ Kazan wa Bulgar wa muluk at-Tatar gözden geçirilmesi [Fahreddinov R. Review of Compilation of Information and Renewal of Legends about the Events Related to Kazan, Bulgar and the Tatar Kings (in Turkic)]. Shura. 1908. No. 6, pp. 180–181.
17. Fahreddinov R. Bugün islam tarihi yazımı [Fahreddinov R. Of Islamic History Writing Today]. Shura. 1908. No. 9, pp. 293–294 (in Turkic).
18. Marjani Shihab al-Din. Mustafad al-akhbar fi ahwal-i Kazan wa Bulgar [Marjani Shihab al-Din. Extract of Useful information about Kazan and Bulgar]. Vol. 1. Kazan: Dombrovsky tabghyhanase, 1897 (in Turkic).
19. Ramzi M. Talfik al-ahbar wa talkih al-asar fi waqa’i‘ Kazan wa Bulgar wa muluk at-Tatar [Ramzi M. Compilation of Information and Renewal of Legends about the Events Related to Kazan, Bulgar and the Tatar Kings]. In 2 vols. Orenburg: Typolytography of Husaynov, Karimov and Cо, 1908 (in Arabic).